Home History History: The First Romans Were Black People

History: The First Romans Were Black People


All these years, the real history of black people are being hidden from the public eyes because we never cared to read about our real history before colonization. In this article, I’ll be talking about the Etruscans.

It is no longer news that the first humans on earth were black people. And since that is so and has been proven by historians, scientists, and archeologists, it is safe to agree that Black people dominated many parts of Europe for thousands and hundreds of years, before the Caucasians moved in & dominated.

Please Note: The scientific Study “Cranial Discrete Traits in a Byzantine Population and Eastern Mediterranean Population Movements,” Ricaut, F. X. and Waelkens, M (2008). Human Biology: Vol. 80: Iss. 5, Article 5.

It proves that the Eastern Roman Empire (the Byzantine) was Black, and by corollary, the Western Roman Empire. The study also explains indirectly, why the Eastern Orthodox Catholic Church, which was not overcome by the Albino Turks from Asia until 1453, still presents it’s Saints and other personages of honor as Black Skinned, while the Roman Catholic Church, which was overcome by the Albino Germanics from Central Asia much earlier, (476 A.D.), presents all related personages as White. This dichotomy is demonstrated by portraits of people Sainted before the schism. Note the case of Saint Vladimir the Great, who was a prince of Novgorod, grand prince of Kiev, and ruler of Kievan Rus’ from 980 to 1015. Vladimir’s father was prince Sviatoslav of the Rurik dynasty. (In Russia as everywhere else, the original Monarchs were Blacks).

The Great Schism (1054 A.D.) was the break of communion between what is now the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox church, which has lasted since the 11th century. The Albinos told us that the irreconcilable issues were: the source of the Holy Spirit, whether leavened or unleavened bread should be used in the Eucharist, the Bishop of Rome’s claim to universal jurisdiction, and the place of the See of Constantinople in relation to the Pentarchy.
Considering the great upheavals in Europe which were precipitated by the Mongols emptying-out Asia of all of its Albinos, and chasing them into Black Europe: (the study establishes the truth that Europe was Black also): doesn’t it seem more credible than the schism in the Catholic Church was really about RACE?
Adherents of the Orthodox Church are, of course, themselves Albinos: just Slav’s instead of Germanic’s. So it really would be too much to expect them to depict some of their Black Saints with Negroid features, (Blacks, of course, have Caucasian, Mongol, and Negroid features). The fact that they depict them “Dark” shows that they are at least “Trying”.

What is this all about?

Sometime during the 19th century, when the Albino people decided to revise Man’s history. In their new history: they became the natives of Europe, and in a totally mindless example of intellectual greed, they also declared that they were also man’s original civilizations – including Egypt (Kemet). This revising of history lasted through the nintenth and twentieth centuries. Now in the twenty-first century, some institutions & individuals are trying to undo that two centuries of lies (perhaps in an effort to lessen the shock of publications like this one). In this case, it is one of the formerly foremost purveyors of Albino lie History – National Geographic. In April 2013, National Geographic published a study which “Admits” that Africans were the Original settlers of Europe. And Also “Admits” that MODERN Europeans are just newcomers. But as usual, the Albinos always refuse to admit that modern Europeans are Central Asian Albinos. But because many people, including some Blacks, won’t believe anything unless a White person says so, we include it in our presentation.


Is this True?

On the matter of credibility: On first reading, readers of these pages generally feel amazement, the concept of Blacks being the original settlers, and builders of the early civilizations everywhere, including Europe, is particularly unsettling to them. Both Black and White, because they were taught that there were no Blacks in Europe until the Romans brought them. Then some Blacks correctly say: wow, I knew the Whites were lying, and then go on to enjoy their edification. But Whites remain doubtful, they say: this is simply Blacks with no accomplishments, trying to steal White achievement and history! They say, if this were true, my Teachers and Professors would have taught it to me. So either this is lies, or the information is so new that my Teachers and Professors don’t know about it yet!

Well No, though it may be comforting to believe that your Teachers and Professors are of sufficient character and would not lie to you, the facts do not support that conclusion. The fact is that even European scientists had evidence, and knew from earlier that the 19th century, of the Black mans central role in settling and establishing civilization in Europe and everywhere else. The exhibits below attest to the fact that this knowledge was known over a hundred years ago. So either your history Teachers and Professors are indeed liars, or they were very poorly educated or they just didnt study enough.



By Professor G. F. SCOTT ELLIOT, M.A., B.Sc., F.L.S., F.R.G.S.

With Seventy Illustrations and Diagrams. Demy 8vo. 7/6 net.


The Aurignacians found the Moustierian or Neander-thaler in France, and during all the changes sketched above, the former seem to have held their own in that country. After the Wurm Ice Age the Aurignacians modified their weapons and mode of life, and, after the theory which we have adopted, became the men of La Madeleine.

These Aurignacians and their Magdalenian descendants pervaded all Central and Southern Europe. Their remains have also been discovered in Valetta (Malta), in Phoenicia (Nahr Antelias), and elsewhere, as we shall try to show later. But during this long period of time two other races also succeeded in entering France and Italy. These were a “ negroid,” perhaps pygmy, folk and the men of Solutrean.

We have seen that the Aurignacian was originally an African, and if he traversed North Africa on his way from Egypt and Mesopotamia, it would have been a very remarkable fact if he had not come in contact with the African pygmy or his ancestors, for the Bushman, Wam-battu, and the other pygmies are the oldest African race known to us.

The “ negroids ” discovered by Dr. Verneau in the Grotte du Grimaldi, though differing greatly from modern Bushmen, show that the Aurignacians were acquainted with a negroid stock, which may perhaps be assumed to be an ancestor of, or allied to, the pygmy. It is difficult to say exactly what was the relation between the Aurignacian and this “ negroid ” race.

Moreover, since the discovery of this burial, characteristic skulls of the same negroid affinity have been found in Spain, in Brittany (of Neolithic date), at Sierra (not earlier than the thirteenth century), in Sardinia, at Ostorf, and perhaps in Caithness.